During a robbery, which of the following constitutes aggravated robbery?

The scenario that constitutes aggravated robbery involves the act of verbally indicating one has a gun or dangerous weapon during the commission of a robbery. This is significant because it adds an element of threat and intimidation to the crime, elevating its severity. Aggravated robbery is characterized by the use of threats or the presence of a weapon, whether it is actual or implied. When a perpetrator brandsishes a weapon or claims to have one, it instills fear in the victim, which escalates the crime beyond simple robbery.

While other choices involve elements related to unlawful acts, they do not carry the same weight in terms of the threat they pose to the victim. Entering a residence may pertain to a burglary context but doesn't necessarily imply the threat of violence. Being unlawfully present has legal implications but lacks the direct connection to the severity of robbery. Discharging a firearm during a robbery also constitutes a serious crime, but merely indicating the presence of a weapon raises the level of danger during the act itself, underscoring the immediacy of threat in the context of aggravated robbery.

Therefore, the action of verbally indicating the possession of a weapon during a robbery is what specifically defines aggravated robbery, directly correlating the threat level with the crime’s classification.