If a court finds that a defendant's interrogation violated Section 725 ILCS 5/103-2.1, what happens to statements made by the defendant?

When a court finds that a defendant's interrogation violated Section 725 ILCS 5/103-2.1, the statements made by the defendant are deemed inadmissible in court. This statute pertains to the rights of individuals during custodial interrogations, ensuring that any statement made under coercion or without the proper advisement of rights is not allowed as evidence. The principle behind this is to uphold fair legal processes and protect defendants from self-incrimination or being subjected to unconstitutionally conducted interrogations.

By ruling the statements as inadmissible, the court reinforces the legal protections in place to ensure that any evidence presented in a trial is obtained lawfully and ethically. This approach is vital for maintaining the integrity of the criminal justice system, as it prevents the use of potentially coerced or improperly obtained confessions against the defendant during prosecution.

Options suggesting that the statements can be used for prosecution or remain valid misinterpret the provision of the law. Statements that do not meet the lawful requirements cannot be relied upon in court, underscoring the commitment to safeguarding individual rights during legal proceedings.