True or False: All lineup procedures must be recorded unless it’s impractical or the eyewitness refuses.

The assertion that all lineup procedures must be recorded unless it’s impractical or the eyewitness refuses is grounded in recognized best practices and protocols aimed at ensuring the integrity of eyewitness identification. Recording these procedures serves multiple purposes: it provides a clear and objective record of the lineup, helps to prevent any potential misconduct, and enhances the reliability of the identification process. By requiring documentation, law enforcement agencies foster transparency and accountability, which is essential for maintaining public trust and ensuring the integrity of the justice system.

Exceptions that allow for the absence of recording, such as impracticality or refusal by the eyewitness, acknowledge the complexities of real-life scenarios where not every situation allows for strict adherence to procedures. However, the overall guiding principle remains that recording is a fundamental requirement to ensure best practices are followed in the identification process.

In contrast, responses that suggest the statement is false, sometimes true, or depends on the case do not align with established protocols that usually mandate recording for systemic integrity. Such responses undermine the overarching need to uphold rigorous standards in eyewitness identification, which is crucial for preventing wrongful convictions and ensuring fair trials.