What kind of evidence could lead to an entrapment defense in a criminal case?

Inducing conduct by law enforcement is key to an entrapment defense because it involves law enforcement agents persuading or encouraging an individual to commit a crime that they otherwise would not have committed. This principle is based on the idea that the government should not create criminal conduct that would not have otherwise occurred but for their involvement. In cases where the defendant can demonstrate that they were persuaded or induced by law enforcement to engage in illegal activity, it can be argued that their actions were not a product of their free will, therefore supporting an entrapment defense.

This concept is critical in cases where the integrity of law enforcement practices is at stake, as it aims to prevent the state from creating criminals through compelling actions. Other options provided, such as obtaining a confession or coercing a witness, do not address the specific legal standard for entrapment. Filming without consent may relate to privacy violations or unlawful surveillance but does not pertain to the entrapment argument in a criminal case.